M01 SELF-CHECK

Module 1 self-check

Five questions · 4/5 to pass · unlimited retry

1. Which observation distinguishes an agent action from a command printed in chat? The answer uses confident wording. A tool record identifies the executed command and its result. The answer contains a code fence.

2. What does supplying a project note during inference do? It provides current interaction context. It permanently retrains every future session. It guarantees every answer uses the note correctly.

3. A model gives a board pin without an exact reference. What next action fits? Ask two models and use the majority. Inspect the exact board variant pinout or schematic. Wire it because the name sounds familiar.

4. A synthetic invalid tuple contains 31.0 °C. Which conclusion is supported? The room is hot. The sensor cable is disconnected. The fixture represents invalid input; policy and physical cause need separate evidence.

5. The BenchNote note says invalid→FAULT and leaves recovery unspecified. An answer says “FAULT; recover after three valid samples.” Which review is right? Accept both because the first claim is correct. Keep FAULT; mark the recovery count unsupported. Reject FAULT because a number exists.

Your result

Not attempted

Read the correct answers and explanations

Question 1

A tool record identifies the executed command and its result.

Correct: the action record and context support what actually ran.

The answer uses confident wording.: Confidence supplies no execution evidence.
A tool record identifies the executed command and its result.: Correct: the action record and context support what actually ran.
The answer contains a code fence.: Code formatting can contain proposed or illustrative text.

Question 2

It provides current interaction context.

Correct: the note can inform this interaction and still needs verification.

It provides current interaction context.: Correct: the note can inform this interaction and still needs verification.
It permanently retrains every future session.: Context input is not the same operation as training parameters.
It guarantees every answer uses the note correctly.: Relevant context helps but does not guarantee correct interpretation.

Question 3

Inspect the exact board variant pinout or schematic.

Correct: verify the claim against the applicable primary document.

Ask two models and use the majority.: Agreement does not supply primary evidence.
Inspect the exact board variant pinout or schematic.: Correct: verify the claim against the applicable primary document.
Wire it because the name sounds familiar.: A familiar family name can hide a consequential variant difference.

Question 4

The fixture represents invalid input; policy and physical cause need separate evidence.

Correct: preserve validity and distinguish software rules from physical explanations.

The room is hot.: The value is authored synthetic input, not a room observation.
The sensor cable is disconnected.: A synthetic tuple cannot establish a cable condition.
The fixture represents invalid input; policy and physical cause need separate evidence.: Correct: preserve validity and distinguish software rules from physical explanations.

Question 5

Keep FAULT; mark the recovery count unsupported.

Correct: judge claims individually against the supplied note.

Accept both because the first claim is correct.: Correctness of one claim does not justify an unrelated addition.
Keep FAULT; mark the recovery count unsupported.: Correct: judge claims individually against the supplied note.
Reject FAULT because a number exists.: The validity rule governs the case; a numeric field does not override it.