M04 SELF-CHECK

Context and evidence

Five questions · 4/5 to pass · unlimited retry

1. Why inspect Markdown source and preview? Preview alone proves commands work. Source checks exact syntax; preview checks the reading and copying experience. Source is unnecessary after publishing.

2. Which statement is a test result? The monitor must enter the specified state. Use synthetic input for the core path. A named replay command on a recorded checkpoint produced the saved output.

3. The family guide and a product page show different memory variants. What should you do? Choose the larger value. Resolve exact product identity and use the applicable primary section. Average the values.

4. You corrected hardware.md but the handoff still contains the stale value. Is the repair complete? No; review current dependent guidance and scope historical records. Yes; agents always read the hardware file first. Yes; a correct link proves all claims are current.

5. A note reads “Planned: run replay. Result: board verified.” No command receipt exists. What is wrong? Only its formatting is wrong. Nothing; a plan is enough. The observation is unsupported, and replay would not establish physical board verification.

Your result

Not attempted

Read the correct answers and explanations

Question 1

Source checks exact syntax; preview checks the reading and copying experience.

Source and preview reveal different faults. Execution and link checks remain separate actions.

Question 2

A named replay command on a recorded checkpoint produced the saved output.

A result records an actual procedure and outcome. The other statements are a requirement and a decision.

Question 3

Resolve exact product identity and use the applicable primary section.

A family name may include different products. Identity and applicability resolve the claim.

Question 4

No; review current dependent guidance and scope historical records.

The next session may encounter the handoff first. Consistency requires checking current dependent context.

Question 5

The observation is unsupported, and replay would not establish physical board verification.

The record turns intention into observation and exceeds the evidence that replay could provide.